Get Free Ebook Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom
When you have actually read it extra pages, you will certainly understand a growing number of again. In addition when you have read all finished. That's your time to constantly bear in mind as well as do exactly what the lesson and also experience of this book supplied to you. By this problem, you should recognize that every book ahs different way to offer the impression to any kind of readers. Yet they will be and also need to be. This is just what the DDD constantly provides you lesson concerning it.
Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom
Get Free Ebook Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom
Inside Ms.: 25 Years Of The Magazine And The Feminist Movement, By Mary Thom. In what instance do you like reading so much? What about the kind of the publication Inside Ms.: 25 Years Of The Magazine And The Feminist Movement, By Mary Thom The requirements to check out? Well, everybody has their very own factor why should check out some books Inside Ms.: 25 Years Of The Magazine And The Feminist Movement, By Mary Thom Mainly, it will certainly associate with their necessity to obtain knowledge from guide Inside Ms.: 25 Years Of The Magazine And The Feminist Movement, By Mary Thom as well as wish to check out just to obtain enjoyment. Stories, story publication, as well as various other entertaining e-books end up being so preferred now. Besides, the clinical publications will additionally be the finest reason to pick, especially for the pupils, instructors, doctors, business person, and also other careers who enjoy reading.
Even the price of a book Inside Ms.: 25 Years Of The Magazine And The Feminist Movement, By Mary Thom is so budget-friendly; many individuals are really thrifty to reserve their money to get guides. The other reasons are that they feel bad as well as have no time to visit guide shop to search the e-book Inside Ms.: 25 Years Of The Magazine And The Feminist Movement, By Mary Thom to check out. Well, this is contemporary era; numerous books can be got effortlessly. As this Inside Ms.: 25 Years Of The Magazine And The Feminist Movement, By Mary Thom as well as much more publications, they can be obtained in quite fast ways. You will not should go outdoors to get this e-book Inside Ms.: 25 Years Of The Magazine And The Feminist Movement, By Mary Thom
Sooner you get guide Inside Ms.: 25 Years Of The Magazine And The Feminist Movement, By Mary Thom, quicker you can delight in reviewing guide. It will certainly be your count on maintain downloading and install the book Inside Ms.: 25 Years Of The Magazine And The Feminist Movement, By Mary Thom in supplied link. This way, you can really making a decision that is served to get your very own e-book on the internet. Right here, be the initial to obtain guide qualified Inside Ms.: 25 Years Of The Magazine And The Feminist Movement, By Mary Thom as well as be the very first to understand exactly how the writer suggests the message as well as knowledge for you.
Loving this publication means caring your pastime. Reading this book will suggest prominent life quality to be much better. Better in al point could not be accomplished basically time. Yet, this publication will aid you to constantly improve the generosity and also spirit of better life. When finding the Inside Ms.: 25 Years Of The Magazine And The Feminist Movement, By Mary Thom to download, you might not ignore this. You need to get it currently and read it quicker. Sooner you read this publication, sooner you will certainly be more success from previous! This is your option and also we always think about it!
Amazon.com Review
Ms., the American magazine that has reflected and whipped up feminist sentiment for a quarter of a century, is the subject of this absorbing insider account by Mary Thom, who worked her way up from researcher to executive editor. Thom dips into the feminist movement, focusing on events or trends that overlapped with the politics and interests of Ms. staffers. The magazine illuminated domestic abuse, sexual harassment, and violence against women and sparked acrimonious debates on issues where feminists disagreed, such as pornography, child rearing, and making the mainstream movement more palatable by cutting out certain groups. An undeniable partisan, Thom glosses over many fights, mistakes, and thick-headed actions, but turns in an engaging portrait of the personalities and times that shaped the magazine.
Read more
From Library Journal
July 1997 marks the 25th anniversary of Ms. magazine. Thom attended the planning meetings that launched the magazine and is still listed as a contributing editor. Her personal experiences, combined with interviews of colleagues, form the basis of this history, which recounts how against the backdrop of the feminist activities of the early 1970s, a group of editors and writers led by founding editors Gloria Steinem and Patricia Carbine strategized to create a radically different kind of magazine for women. Thom offers detailed portraits of the women involved, from Steinem to many lesser-known editors and writers. She covers the magazine's financial struggles, its role in the women's movement, and its relationship with readers. Although she mentions negative issues, such as accusations of middle-class bias and racism, Thom fails to take a critical look at Ms.'s role in the women's movement or in publishing history. Despite this drawback, libraries with women's studies collections will want to purchase.-?Judy Solberg, George Washington Univ., Washington, D.C.Copyright 1997 Reed Business Information, Inc.
Read more
See all Editorial Reviews
Product details
Hardcover: 244 pages
Publisher: Henry Holt & Co; 1st edition (July 1, 1997)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0805037322
ISBN-13: 978-0805037326
Product Dimensions:
6.5 x 1 x 9.8 inches
Shipping Weight: 1.2 pounds
Average Customer Review:
4.4 out of 5 stars
5 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#1,507,761 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
At the time this book was published in 1997, Mary Thom was the executive editor of Ms., after starting out as a researcher and then writer, and then senior editor; she also edited Letters to Ms., 1972-1987.She wrote in the first chapter, “Gloria Steinem was backing her way into Ms. The idea of starting something as viable and substantial as a magazine---with staff and readers, financial backers, and quite possibly a movement relying on it---was terrifying to a freelance writer who had never really held a regular job. But while she was reaching for an audience as a speaker, she did need a comfortable vehicle for her writing---one that simply did not exist.†(Pg. 8-9)About the name of the magazine, she recounts, “There had been a strong contingent that had favored ‘Sisters,’ but Gloria Steinem held out for the more symbolic ‘Ms.’ On that level, the name worked well. Ms. clearly broke with tradition, fairly screaming that this was more than just another women’s magazine. The Ms. woman was independent. She would not be defined by her relationship, or lack of it, to a man, be it husband or father. She stood up for herself… The statement was a bold one at a time when, for example, women routinely were denied credit in their own names. Merely explaining what the name meant became an opportunity to change minds.†(Pg. 14)After the first issue was published, “The elation of the staff could not be dimmed by the television news commentary that same evening by the late Harry Reasoner. ‘I’ll give it six months,’ Reasoner said of the new Ms., before they run out of things to say.†Years later, on the occasion of the magazine’s fifth anniversary, he was gracious enough to take it back.†(Pg. 43)She points out, “Its agenda did make Ms. seem more like a social movement than a national magazine, and both the staff and the watching world expected feminist principles to govern all levels of activity…And because the pressure of monthly deadlines did nothing to diminish the urgency of feminist goals, Ms. had to operate, for better or worse, both as a publishing enterprise and a center for activism.†(Pg. 44-45)She chronicles the acrimonious relationship between Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan: “Friedan and Steinem had never been close colleagues or friends, although in the past year they had collaborated … to found the National Women’s Political Caucus (NWPC). Friedan … accused Steinem, and [Bella] Abzug as well, of ‘female chauvinism’ that ‘could make men slam the door in our faces.’ … Friedan made the most of the publicity potential of her turning in Steinem by calling a press conference on July 18, 1972… she accused Steinem of making a woman feel apologetic for ‘loving her husband or children’… It’s a oversimplification to say that Betty Friedan was suffering from an acute case of hurt feelings because of the growing popularity of Gloria Steinem and Ms. Her subsequent writings, particularly in her book The Second Stage, demonstrate that she remained upset and embarrassed by what she saw as an antimale bias in feminism. But there is no doubt that she experienced rejection earlier in the year when a NWPC meeting was called to pick a spokeswoman for the Democratic National Convention. Steinem… was chosen for the post even though she had not sought the position and Friedan had vigorously lobbied for it.†(Pg. 50-52)Of the incident when the Redstockings published a press release accusing Gloria Steinem and Ms. of being agents of the CIA, she reports: “Steinem had years before worked for a foundation in Cambridge, Massachusetts, that encouraged young people from the United States to attend International Communist Youth Festivals. Some financing for students and young people attending those events came indirectly from the CIA… Steinem had made her role public after Ramparts magazine came out with an exposé in 1967 on how CIA money passed through foundations to the NSA and other groups… Steinem finally did, reluctantly and ‘in anger’ answer the Redstockings indictment in an August 15 release to the feminist press. And she did acknowledge that working with a project that involved CIA funding was a mistake: ‘It’s painfully clear with hindsight that even indirect, control-free funding was a mistake if it couldn’t be publicized, but I didn’t realize that then.’†(Pg. 74-79)She points out that after Alice Walker moved to California, she “remained a contributing editor until the end of 1986 when she abruptly withdrew her name from the masthead. In her brief letter of resignation, she said she wanted Ms. to know of the ‘swift alienation’ she and her daughter, Rebecca, felt when the magazine arrives ‘with its determinedly [and to us grim] white cover.’ … Joanne Edgar and Rosemary Bray, who had joined the Ms. staff in 1985 after editing for Essence, both told Alice Walker how upset they were at her letter. Walker wrote back with a longer explanation that she hoped... would be published. She said, among other things, that the reason she had stopped going to editorial meetings when she had been on staff all those years ago was that ‘it became clear that what racial color there was to be in the magazine I was expected to provide or represent.’†(Pg. 89-90)Of the antipornography debates of the 1980s, she recalls, “I asked Andrea Dworkin an obvious question: If ordinances like these are passed, especially with right-wing antifeminist support, would ‘Ms.’ not be among the first publications attacked? Her response was... perhaps that was something we would just have to live with. To her great credit, Dworkin recognized that her own, often sexually explicit fiction might also be in jeopardy if her statute was misused. But, characteristically, that risk would not stop her from standing firm on the front line of this battle. Whatever one’s position, it was impossible not to admire Andrea Dworkin.†(Pg. 94)She acknowledges, “Over the years, Ms. readers reserved their most serious and sustained criticism not for a particular ad campaign but for an entire category. Many readers did not want Ms. to carry cigarette advertising. Some hated the alcohol ads as well… Ms. explained the decision … ‘There is a clear warning on the package and in the ads that smoking is dangerous. After some consideration, it seemed to us that the reader had the right to make the choice’… At the time, most of the Ms. editors smoked, and the explanations probably sounded more principles and less tortured than it does today… But tobacco advertising was such a large category for Ms… no one on the staff thought the magazine could survive without the income from cigarette ads. As Gloria Steinem wrote, the necessity of taking tobacco ads had ‘become a kind of prison.’†(Pg. 135-136)After Steinem relinquished her editorship of the magazine, “Suzanne Levine believes that Ms. suffered more from Steinem’s absence… than the editors knew at the time… When Steinem did not have a daily involvement with the magazine, ‘there was a level of imagination and optimism and freshness that we couldn’t duplicate… Just having her around, talking about perceptions of the day’s events, coming back from trips with those little scraps of paper about people she’d met, her comments on articles, her ability to make us deal with each other in a different way. When those things were taken away it brought down the level of creativity and honesty at the magazine.’†(Pg. 170)Of the decision to go ad-free, she records, “perhaps many more of the core readership of Ms. would be willing to invest $30 or more in an advertising-free revival of the magazine. That is what Gloria Steinem and Robin Morgan, who would edit the new version, asked of them early in 1990. Ms. readers responded once again. They would pay a premium for their magazine. Many readers were doubly generous and checked off a box on the subscription form to pay for the magazine to be sent to battered women shelters and to other women who could not afford the higher rate.†(Pg. 217)One looking for a more critical perspective on the magazine will need to look elsewhere. But those of us who have been among Ms.’s loyal readership will delight in this “insider†account of the magazine.
very dense, but lots of interesting information
At the time this book was published in 1997, Mary Thom was the executive editor of Ms., after starting out as a researcher and then writer, and then senior editor; she also edited Letters to Ms., 1972-1987.She wrote in the first chapter, “Gloria Steinem was backing her way into Ms. The idea of starting something as viable and substantial as a magazine---with staff and readers, financial backers, and quite possibly a movement relying on it---was terrifying to a freelance writer who had never really held a regular job. But while she was reaching for an audience as a speaker, she did need a comfortable vehicle for her writing---one that simply did not exist.†(Pg. 8-9)About the name of the magazine, she recounts, “There had been a strong contingent that had favored ‘Sisters,’ but Gloria Steinem held out for the more symbolic ‘Ms.’ On that level, the name worked well. Ms. clearly broke with tradition, fairly screaming that this was more than just another women’s magazine. The Ms. woman was independent. She would not be defined by her relationship, or lack of it, to a man, be it husband or father. She stood up for herself… The statement was a bold one at a time when, for example, women routinely were denied credit in their own names. Merely explaining what the name meant became an opportunity to change minds.†(Pg. 14)After the first issue was published, “The elation of the staff could not be dimmed by the television news commentary that same evening by the late Harry Reasoner. ‘I’ll give it six months,’ Reasoner said of the new Ms., before they run out of things to say.†Years later, on the occasion of the magazine’s fifth anniversary, he was gracious enough to take it back.†(Pg. 43)She points out, “Its agenda did make Ms. seem more like a social movement than a national magazine, and both the staff and the watching world expected feminist principles to govern all levels of activity…And because the pressure of monthly deadlines did nothing to diminish the urgency of feminist goals, Ms. had to operate, for better or worse, both as a publishing enterprise and a center for activism.†(Pg. 44-45)She chronicles the acrimonious relationship between Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan: “Friedan and Steinem had never been close colleagues or friends, although in the past year they had collaborated … to found the National Women’s Political Caucus (NWPC). Friedan … accused Steinem, and [Bella] Abzug as well, of ‘female chauvinism’ that ‘could make men slam the door in our faces.’ … Friedan made the most of the publicity potential of her turning in Steinem by calling a press conference on July 18, 1972… she accused Steinem of making a woman feel apologetic for ‘loving her husband or children’… It’s a oversimplification to say that Betty Friedan was suffering from an acute case of hurt feelings because of the growing popularity of Gloria Steinem and Ms. Her subsequent writings, particularly in her book The Second Stage, demonstrate that she remained upset and embarrassed by what she saw as an antimale bias in feminism. But there is no doubt that she experienced rejection earlier in the year when a NWPC meeting was called to pick a spokeswoman for the Democratic National Convention. Steinem… was chosen for the post even though she had not sought the position and Friedan had vigorously lobbied for it.†(Pg. 50-52)Of the incident when the Redstockings published a press release accusing Gloria Steinem and Ms. of being agents of the CIA, she reports: “Steinem had years before worked for a foundation in Cambridge, Massachusetts, that encouraged young people from the United States to attend International Communist Youth Festivals. Some financing for students and young people attending those events came indirectly from the CIA… Steinem had made her role public after Ramparts magazine came out with an exposé in 1967 on how CIA money passed through foundations to the NSA and other groups… Steinem finally did, reluctantly and ‘in anger’ answer the Redstockings indictment in an August 15 release to the feminist press. And she did acknowledge that working with a project that involved CIA funding was a mistake: ‘It’s painfully clear with hindsight that even indirect, control-free funding was a mistake if it couldn’t be publicized, but I didn’t realize that then.’†(Pg. 74-79)She points out that after Alice Walker moved to California, she “remained a contributing editor until the end of 1986 when she abruptly withdrew her name from the masthead. In her brief letter of resignation, she said she wanted Ms. to know of the ‘swift alienation’ she and her daughter, Rebecca, felt when the magazine arrives ‘with its determinedly [and to us grim] white cover.’ … Joanne Edgar and Rosemary Bray, who had joined the Ms. staff in 1985 after editing for Essence, both told Alice Walker how upset they were at her letter. Walker wrote back with a longer explanation that she hoped... would be published. She said, among other things, that the reason she had stopped going to editorial meetings when she had been on staff all those years ago was that ‘it became clear that what racial color there was to be in the magazine I was expected to provide or represent.’†(Pg. 89-90)Of the antipornography debates of the 1980s, she recalls, “I asked Andrea Dworkin an obvious question: If ordinances like these are passed, especially with right-wing antifeminist support, would ‘Ms.’ not be among the first publications attacked? Her response was... perhaps that was something we would just have to live with. To her great credit, Dworkin recognized that her own, often sexually explicit fiction might also be in jeopardy if her statute was misused. But, characteristically, that risk would not stop her from standing firm on the front line of this battle. Whatever one’s position, it was impossible not to admire Andrea Dworkin.†(Pg. 94)She acknowledges, “Over the years, Ms. readers reserved their most serious and sustained criticism not for a particular ad campaign but for an entire category. Many readers did not want Ms. to carry cigarette advertising. Some hated the alcohol ads as well… Ms. explained the decision … ‘There is a clear warning on the package and in the ads that smoking is dangerous. After some consideration, it seemed to us that the reader had the right to make the choice’… At the time, most of the Ms. editors smoked, and the explanations probably sounded more principles and less tortured than it does today… But tobacco advertising was such a large category for Ms… no one on the staff thought the magazine could survive without the income from cigarette ads. As Gloria Steinem wrote, the necessity of taking tobacco ads had ‘become a kind of prison.’†(Pg. 135-136)After Steinem relinquished her editorship of the magazine, “Suzanne Levine believes that Ms. suffered more from Steinem’s absence… than the editors knew at the time… When Steinem did not have a daily involvement with the magazine, ‘there was a level of imagination and optimism and freshness that we couldn’t duplicate… Just having her around, talking about perceptions of the day’s events, coming back from trips with those little scraps of paper about people she’d met, her comments on articles, her ability to make us deal with each other in a different way. When those things were taken away it brought down the level of creativity and honesty at the magazine.’†(Pg. 170)Of the decision to go ad-free, she records, “perhaps many more of the core readership of Ms. would be willing to invest $30 or more in an advertising-free revival of the magazine. That is what Gloria Steinem and Robin Morgan, who would edit the new version, asked of them early in 1990. Ms. readers responded once again. They would pay a premium for their magazine. Many readers were doubly generous and checked off a box on the subscription form to pay for the magazine to be sent to battered women shelters and to other women who could not afford the higher rate.†(Pg. 217)One looking for a more critical perspective on the magazine will need to look elsewhere. But those of us who have been among Ms.’s loyal readership will delight in this “insider†account of the magazine.
Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom PDF
Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom EPub
Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom Doc
Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom iBooks
Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom rtf
Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom Mobipocket
Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom Kindle
Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom PDF
Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom PDF
Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom PDF
Inside Ms.: 25 Years of the Magazine and the Feminist Movement, by Mary Thom PDF
